• We can access sites you never thought possible
  • We can test ground you never thought possible
  • Available to work anywhere
  •  


    Vane Shear Testing Procedure

    For a copy of IGS' vane shear testing procedure, click here

    CPT Test Types

    For a PDF copy of these test procedures please see CPT Test Type Classification System.PDF

    EXPLANATION OF CPT TEST TYPES TABULATED BELOW

    At IGS we define “quality service” as being satisfactory implementation of the class or type of test required by the client, to suit their particular needs. Note that:
    • It is certainly not high quality to fail to meet any particular client’s technical expectations.


    • Equally though, neither is it high quality to provide a class or type of test that any particular client neither needs nor wants for their particular application.
    Particularly, for instance, if that class or type of test takes longer (and thus costs more) than a test that would otherwise have fully suited the client’s needs. As we offer a range of different CPT test types, all of “high quality” for their particular application, it is convenient to tabulate these and define a system of test designation (ie test-type-name) to assist in communicating with clients and helping them direct IGS as succinctly as possible in regard to their needs.

    There is no international or Australian standard to guide us in preparing this classification system so we have prepared our own hierarchy of test types and unambiguously designated these Types IGS-1, IGS-2, IGS-3 and IGS-S and IGS-R as tabulated below. The classification system has evolved from our own experience with our own clients and is a reflection of our own current opinions. We would appreciate any feedback from any client and advise that the classification system might evolve with time and with hoped-for constructive client feedback.

    Type Brief Description (and client role) Typical Application Methods Typically
    Employed by IGS Operator
    IGS-1 Standard Piezocone Testing

    Client must (pre-testing) brief IGS on their choice of this type. Little or no client involvement is required during testing progress.

    Objective is good quality data, including good pore pressure response. However, if pore pressure response problems evolve in any “difficult” test zone, time is not squandered trying to solve them.

    Typically a client is hoping for reasonably high productivity using this method.



    For use when clients want a reliable soil profile and to establish design parameters to historically-normal levels of client expectation.

    May be the base test type chosen for a known soft clayey soil project for overall site profiling.

    Good quality pore pressure response is usually achieved



    Usually 100MPa, 10cm2 compression cone is used.
    Cone is carefully prepped and pore pressure measurements are made as test progresses.

    If soil behaviour spoils piezo response in some zones, test penetration is paused briefly to permit “catch up”.

    Should difficult soil layers be encountered (eg gravely bands or hard fissured layers causing tilt), test may need to be immediately discontinued – at discretion of IGS operator.
    IGS-2 Subtraction Piezo-Cone Testing

    Client must (pre-testing) brief IGS on their choice of this test type. Little or no client involvement is required during testing progress.

    Objective is good quality data, including good pore pressure response. However, if pore pressure response problems evolve in any “difficult” test zone, time is not squandered trying to solve them.

    Typically a client is hoping for high productivity using this method, even in some difficult-to penetrate soils (eg bands of dense sands, hard fissured clays, etc)



    For use when clients want a reliable soil profile and to establish design parameters at “site characterisation” level.

    May be the base test type chosen for a variable or unknown soil type for overall site profiling.

    Good quality pore pressure response is usually achieved and “normal” dissipation tests can be made.



    Usually 100MPa, 15cm2 subtraction cone is used.

    Cone is carefully prepped and pore pressure measurements are made as test progresses.

    If soil behaviour spoils piezo response in some zones, test penetration is continued.

    Should difficult soil layers be encountered (eg gravely bands or hard fissured layers causing tilt), test can typically be carefully continued – at discretion of IGS operator.
    IGS-3 Subtraction Non-Piezo-Cone Testing

    Client must (pre-testing) brief IGS on their choice of this type. Little or no client involvement is required during testing progress.

    As cone does not have a piezo-element, cone preparation is much simpler and quicker – leads to higher project productivity.

    Can be used even in some difficult-to-penetrate soils (eg dense sands, hard fissured clays, etc).



    For use when clients want a reliable soil profile and to establish design parameters at “site characterisation” level. But pore pressure response is not required.

    May be the base test type chosen for a variable or unknown soil type for overall site profiling. IGS recommends this if budget control is critical and site characterisation is the objective.



    Usually 100MPa, 15cm2 subtraction cone is used.

    Should difficult soil layers be encountered (eg gravely bands or hard fissured layers causing tilt), test can typically be carefully continued – at discretion of IGS operator.

    SPECIAL CLASS TESTING
    Type Brief Description (and client role) Typical Application Methods Typically
    Employed by IGS Operator
    IGS-S Special-Class Testing.

    Client must advise IGS of their expectations, as test productivity may sometimes be reduced using this method.

    Objective is best possible pore pressure response in “difficult” ground, but still maintaining reasonably high productivity.

    Client might intervene during progress to shift test type to IGS-R, accepting lower test productivity that results in this shift.


    Typically used at targeted locations after site characterisation by IGS-1, IGS-2 or IGS-3 testing.

    Client wishes to obtain inputs into determination of soil parameters to a “specially” high level.

    Typical objectives may be assessment of soil properties for design of embankments or preloads over soft to firm and stiffer clay-type foundation soils. Dissipation tests should be achieved to a high standard.


    Cone capacity is selected to suit the ground being targeted (eg 100MPa or 10MPa cone choice is made). 10cm2 compression cone is used.

    Pore pressure measurements are closely watched as test progresses. If soil behaviour spoils piezo response in any zones, test penetration is stopped while response monitoring continues.

    If piezo “recovers” in (say) 10-15 minutes test penetration is restarted. If piezo does not “recover” in (say) 10-15 minutes, test penetration might also be started but client accepts consequences of possible zones of reduced pore pressure response. (Note that client can up-grade to IGS-R if desired).
    IGS-R Quasi-Research Class Testing.

    Client must be closely engaged in decision process as in extreme conditions test productivity may be quite low using this method.

    Objective is best possible pore pressure response in “difficult” ground, more-or-less regardless of productivity.



    Typically used at targeted locations after site characterisation by IGS-1, IGS-2 or IGS-3 testing.

    Client wishes to obtain inputs into determination of soil parameters to the highest practically achievable level.

    Typical objectives may be assessment of preconsolidation pressure of very soft clays, or assessment of preload progress based on qc or qt parameters. Dissipation tests should be achieved to best possible standard.



    Cone capacity is selected to suit the ground being targeted (eg 100MPa or 10MPa cone choice is made). 10cm2 compression cone is used.

    Pore pressure measurements are closely watched as test progresses. If soil behaviour spoils piezo response in any zones, test penetration is stopped while response monitoring continues.

    If piezo “recovers”, test penetration is re-started. If piezo does not “recover”, cone may be pulled out, hole may be water-filled and test may be recommenced with a re-prepped cone.
    copyright © Insitu Geotech Services Pty Ltd